mydata <- read.csv2("Titanic.csv")
head(mydata)
## Survived Class Gender
## 1 0 3 0
## 2 0 3 0
## 3 0 3 0
## 4 1 3 1
## 5 1 3 1
## 6 1 3 0
Description:
mydata$Survived <- factor(mydata$Survived,
levels = c(0, 1),
labels = c("No", "Yes"))
mydata$Class <- factor(mydata$Class,
levels = c(1, 2, 3),
labels = c("1st", "2nd", "3rd"))
mydata$Gender <- factor(mydata$Gender,
levels = c(0, 1),
labels = c("M", "F"))
head(mydata)
## Survived Class Gender
## 1 No 3rd M
## 2 No 3rd M
## 3 No 3rd M
## 4 Yes 3rd F
## 5 Yes 3rd F
## 6 Yes 3rd M
chisq_survived_class <- chisq.test(mydata$Survived, mydata$Class,
correct = FALSE)
chisq_survived_class
##
## Pearson's Chi-squared test
##
## data: mydata$Survived and mydata$Class
## X-squared = 127.86, df = 2, p-value < 2.2e-16
addmargins(chisq_survived_class$observed)
## mydata$Class
## mydata$Survived 1st 2nd 3rd Sum
## No 123 158 528 809
## Yes 200 119 181 500
## Sum 323 277 709 1309
round(chisq_survived_class$expected, 2)
## mydata$Class
## mydata$Survived 1st 2nd 3rd
## No 199.62 171.19 438.18
## Yes 123.38 105.81 270.82
round(chisq_survived_class$stdres, 2)
## mydata$Class
## mydata$Survived 1st 2nd 3rd
## No -10.11 -1.84 10.25
## Yes 10.11 1.84 -10.25
addmargins(round(prop.table(chisq_survived_class$observed, 2), 3), 1)
## mydata$Class
## mydata$Survived 1st 2nd 3rd
## No 0.381 0.570 0.745
## Yes 0.619 0.430 0.255
## Sum 1.000 1.000 1.000
addmargins(round(prop.table(chisq_survived_class$observed, 1), 3), 2)
## mydata$Class
## mydata$Survived 1st 2nd 3rd Sum
## No 0.152 0.195 0.653 1.000
## Yes 0.400 0.238 0.362 1.000
library(effectsize)
effectsize::cramers_v(mydata$Survived, mydata$Class)
## Cramer's V (adj.) | 95% CI
## --------------------------------
## 0.31 | [0.26, 1.00]
##
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
interpret_cramers_v(0.31)
## [1] "large"
## (Rules: funder2019)
chisq_survived_gender <- chisq.test(mydata$Survived, mydata$Gender,
correct = TRUE)
chisq_survived_gender
##
## Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
##
## data: mydata$Survived and mydata$Gender
## X-squared = 363.62, df = 1, p-value < 2.2e-16
addmargins(chisq_survived_gender$observed)
## mydata$Gender
## mydata$Survived M F Sum
## No 682 127 809
## Yes 161 339 500
## Sum 843 466 1309
round(chisq_survived_gender$expected, 2)
## mydata$Gender
## mydata$Survived M F
## No 521 288
## Yes 322 178
round(chisq_survived_gender$stdres, 2)
## mydata$Gender
## mydata$Survived M F
## No 19.13 -19.13
## Yes -19.13 19.13
addmargins(round(prop.table(chisq_survived_gender$observed, 2), 3), 1)
## mydata$Gender
## mydata$Survived M F
## No 0.809 0.273
## Yes 0.191 0.727
## Sum 1.000 1.000
addmargins(round(prop.table(chisq_survived_gender$observed, 1), 3), 2)
## mydata$Gender
## mydata$Survived M F Sum
## No 0.843 0.157 1.000
## Yes 0.322 0.678 1.000
library(effectsize)
effectsize::cramers_v(mydata$Survived, mydata$Gender)
## Cramer's V (adj.) | 95% CI
## --------------------------------
## 0.53 | [0.48, 1.00]
##
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
interpret_cramers_v(0.53)
## [1] "very large"
## (Rules: funder2019)
library(effectsize)
interpret_oddsratio(11.13, rules = "cohen1988")
## [1] "large"
## (Rules: cohen1988)
fisher.test(mydata$Survived, mydata$Gender)
##
## Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data
##
## data: mydata$Survived and mydata$Gender
## p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 8.588113 14.898522
## sample estimates:
## odds ratio
## 11.27776